Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for January, 2007

MEDICAL TESTS

STARE INTO THE CAT’S EYES FOR 10 SECONDS…

pic27368.gif

…then scroll down….

NOW STARE AT THE DOGGY…

lab1.jpg

…then scroll down….

NOW STARE AT THIS DOGGY, TOO…

lab2.jpg

…then scroll down….

THANK YOU

YOUR CAT SCAN and LAB TESTS are now COMPLETE!

pic17650.gif

Sorry, couldn’t resist…we all need a good laugh sometimes!

Live simply; Love generously; Care deeply; Speak kindly; and Leave the rest to God!

Read Full Post »

Sent to me from a friend who is probably less charitable than I am, these posted pictures will only make sense if you are a Doctor Doctor Who / Science Fiction fan: 

31-drinan.jpg

  davros.jpg

One was a priest and the other a scientist.

Both condoned immoral medical technology.

Both compromised on the sanctity of life.

Both sought victory for their own and eventually transformed the people they lead.

Daleks were changed from human beings into pathetic radioactive biological organisms within the robotic armor of killing machines.

Democrats were changed from the party that always protected the poor and weakest among us to  a political machine that waged all-out-war against the child in the womb.

Davros argued that everything he did was for the good of the Dalek people.

Drinan argued that being “personally opposed” but energetic in the support of abortion rights was a positive agenda for Democrats and for the good of Americans and others. 

Drinan contributed to the culture of death through a permissive stance on abortion.

Davros  engineered the mutation of his people and the creation of the inhuman Daleks for an endless war.

In both cases, we can hear the cry:

EXTERMINATE!  EXTERMINATE!  EXTERMINATE!

Read Full Post »

drinandalek.jpgI am a few weeks late (January 9, 2007) but I suppose I should acknowledge his passing. The Holy Father ordered him to leave Congress and he did so in 1980. In regards to this discipline, he was obedient. He was a priest, and each and every Mass he offered had immeasurable value. I am not sure what else I can say about him. God will be the one to judge him.

His pro-abortion views never changed. He even supported Clinton’s veto of a partial abortion (infanticide) ban in 1996. Recently, he celebrated Mass for Nancy Pelosi and gave her communion at Trinity College in DC. She is probably the strongest advocate for abortion in Congress, as well as same-sex unions.

Archbishop Wuerl got drawn into the controversy when questioned about the matter and he acknowledged that Drinan had faculties to say Mass and that he would essentially follow Cardinal McCarrick’s lead regarding the reception of Holy Communion. It is not the place of a priest to second-guess his bishop and I am not privy to all that might have been said in a private forum. How can I be critical of men who have done more for the Gospel of Life than I will could ever imagine doing? I do not shy away from my convictions, but I am contrite about rashness and a lack of prudence in the past.

There is so much guilt…so much blood upon our hands…so much passivity in the face of grevious evil…it has cost me, and makes me grieve in spirit. I love the Church and yet sometimes I am ashamed. Words cannot convey the emotions that are stirred. Father Drinan lived a long life and had the esteem of colleagues and his religious order. Pelosi counts herself a good Catholic and a mother. She is now the majority leader of congress and her name is on everyone’s lips. How many millions of children only knew a short life in the womb and then were murdered without being given any name at all?

When it comes to dead babies, there are no other issues…not immigration reform…not minimum wage increases…not military intervention in the Middle East…not vouchers for parochial and private schools…not tax exemption for churches…not balancing the budget and tax changes…not social security and health care…not racial justice and equal opportunity…not even the question of same sex unions. The new holy innocents do not even have proper graves with markers. A selfish and pragmatic reductionism of subjects to objects or persons to things has lead to the cruel holocaust of children made in the image of God with immortal souls.

It is thought by some authorities that upon death we encounter not only Christ as our judge but also all those we have wronged in this world. Father Drinan could have challenged the other Catholics in Congress and the Senate. Instead, he helped to sedate their consciences and became an enabler and supporter of abortion alongside them. In my minds eye, I am haunted by a vision of him on the other side of the grave. He is journeying toward the gates of heaven and Christ but impeding his way he encounters a crowd of over fifty million children. Each one of them is reaching out to him, begging to be loved, and calling out to him as “Father” to give them a name.

ADDENDUM:  FATHER DRINAN IN HIS OWN WORDS

Heaven forbid that I should make a false depiction or representation.  Given criticism I have received, I am adding the following remarks.

The Boston Pilot, November 26, 2004

“It was a very bad idea for the four bishops to say they would refuse to offer Kerry Holy Communion. Abortion is a small issue.”

“I received permission to run for Congress from Cardinal Cushing. The old canon law said you had to get the approval of the local bishop. Then the Polish pope came in and changed the canon law. He didn’t want any priests involved in governments, so I resigned.”

The New York Times, June 4, 1996

“The indignant voices of the pro-life movement and the Republican Party will likely reach new decibels in the campaign to urge Congress to override President Clinton’s veto of the bill banning so-called partial-birth abortions. But Congress should sustain the veto. The bill does not provide an exception for women whose health is at risk, and it would be virtually unenforceable.”

“I write this as a Jesuit priest who agrees with Vatican II, which said abortion is virtually infanticide, and as a lawyer who wants the Clinton administration to do more to carry out its pledge to make abortions rare in this country.” (Notice his qualified language and participation in the Clinton deception.)

Meet the Press, March 27, 2005

“Go back to Vatican II. Three thousand bishops agonized over this, and at the end of the day, they said that the church should never seek to impose its views. They should not have any shadow of coercion, renouncing 20 centuries of the church dominating the scene. So I think that it’s a different world, and we respect everybody else and there’s lots of things that are immoral that should not be illegal.”

“And I think that it–we all agree with that. The problem is when some religions say that you have to impose in the law our particular beliefs. Certain fundamentalists think that gays should be discriminated against, and that’s not in the common tradition. There’s a common core of moral and religious beliefs, and frankly, we are in total violation of that. We are supposed to be good to the poor; we have more poor children in America than in any other industrialized nation. We’re supposed to love prisoners and help them; we have 2.1 million people in prison, the largest of any country of the Earth. We also allow eleven children to be killed by guns every day. All of the religions are opposed to that. That’s violence. Why don’t we organize on that?”

It is said that Father Drinan was the chief architect of the double-speak that was adopted by Catholics and others in political life on the topic of abortion. They would say, “I am personally opposed,” but would work for liberalization of abortion laws arguing that they did not want to impose their religious views on others.

READ HERE THE TRUTH ABOUT HIS SO-CALLED PERMISSION TO RUN FOR POLITICAL OFFICE:

http://www.cwnews.com/news/viewstory.cfm?recnum=21136

Read Full Post »

REST IN PEACE

THE MUNSTERS

  • Yvonne De Carlo (Actress) 1922-2007

SCOOBY-DOO

  • Iwao Takamoto (Animator) 1925-2007

BARNEY MILLER

  • Ron Carey (Actor) 1935-2007

BOOKS

  • Art Buchwald (Columnist) 1925-2007

THE MOD SQUAD/STAR TREK

  • Tige Andrews (Actor) 1920-2007

PATTY DUKE/HART TO HART

  • Sidney Sheldon (Writer/Producer) — 1917-2007

Read Full Post »

WOMEN WORDS

guyoutnumbered.jpg1.) FINE: This is the word women use to end an argument when they are right, and you need to shut up.

2.) Five Minutes: If she is getting dressed, this means half an hour. Five Minutes is only five minutes if you have just been given five more minutes to watch the game before helping around the house.

3.) Nothing: This is the calm before the storm. This means something, and you should be on your toes. Arguments that begin with nothing usually end in fine (see #1).

4.) Go Ahead: This is a dare, not permission. Don’t Do It!

5.) Loud Sigh: This is not actually a word but a non-verbal statement often misunderstood by men. A loud sigh means she thinks you are an idiot and wonders why she is wasting her time standing here and arguing with you about nothing. (Refer back to #3 for the meaning of nothing.)

6.) That’s Okay: This is one of the most dangerous statements a women can make to a man. “That’s okay” means she wants to think long and hard before deciding how and when you will pay for your mistake.

7.) Thanks: A woman is thanking you – do not question or faint. Just say you’re welcome.

8.) Whatever: Is a women’s way of saying “%@< /SPAN>&* YOU!”

9.) Don’t worry about it, I got it: Another dangerous statement, meaning this is something that a woman has told a man to do several times, but is now doing it herself. This will later result in a man asking “what’s wrong” – for the woman’s response refer to #3.

Send this to the men you know to warn them about arguments they can avoid if they remember the terminology.

Read Full Post »

What is the first thing a blonde does after a bad car accident?

Turn off the ignition?

NO

Get away from the car in case it explodes?

NO

Call 911 on her cell phone?

NO

Then what does she do?

blondeaccident.jpg

She brushes her hair and takes in the view.

Read Full Post »

34719548.jpg

This is hardly the stuff of political debate between ladies and gentlemen.  The campaigns are only just beginning, and I suspect that while we will see much to tickle the funny-bone, there will also be a lot of “crude and rude” material as well. 

I might disagree with various people, but what has become of civility?

pic21724.jpg

I have no idea who came up with these images although it was probably a good idea not to put names on them.  Is Hillary bossy?  The joke used to be that when Bill Clinton was president, she was the power behind the throne.  True or not, she has certainly proven herself a capable Senator. 

pic28680.jpg

Actually, while I disagree with her on a crucial subject like the right-to-life of the unborn, she is in appearance a rather classy lady who is quite articulate in expressing herself.  Weak minds insult her looks and dress insteading of addressing the issues.  This kind of mockery can be somewhat amusing between men, but there was once expected a higher level of manners and respect with women. 

I suspect that we had best get ready for a campaign to end all campaigns. 

pic12074.jpg

Is that Chaney?  And I really would have posted something funny against Republican candidates, if I had any such material at hand– other than their speeches that is. 

Feel free to email me your funnies, if you have some to make this posting more balanced. 

PEACE EVERYONE!

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 134 other followers