Below is the planned schedule for Pope Benedict XVI’s visit:
Tuesday, April 15
Arrive in Washington, DC
Wednesday, April 16 (Pope Benedict XVI’s 81st Birthday)
10:30 a.m. – Meet with the President of the United States, The White House
5:30 p.m. – Meet with the bishops of the United States, Basilica of the National Shrine of the Immaculate Conception
Thursday, April 17
10:00 a.m. – Mass hosted by the Archdiocese of Washington, Washington Nationals baseball stadium
5:00 p.m. – Address Catholic educators: presidents of 200 Catholic colleges and universities and education leaders from 195 dioceses, The Catholic University of America
6:30 p.m. – Meet with interfaith leaders, Pope John Paul II Cultural Center
Friday, April 18
Depart for New York
10:45 a.m. – Speech to the United Nations General Assembly, United Nations
6:00 p.m. – Meet with ecumenical leaders, St. Joseph Church in Manhattan
Saturday, April 19 (3rd anniversary of the election of Pope Benedict XVI)
9:15 a.m. – Mass for Priests, Deacons and Religious, St. Patrick’s Cathedral
4:30 p.m. – Meet with Children with Disabilities, St. Joseph’s Seminary Chapel
Youth and Seminarian Rally, Grounds of St. Joseph’s Seminary in Yonkers
Sunday, April 20
9:30 a.m. – Visit to Ground Zero, World Trade Center Site
2:30 p.m. – Mass hosted by the Archdiocese of New York, Yankee Stadium
8:00 p.m. – Depart for Vatican City
that is sooooooooooooooooo cool that he will be visiting
Thanks for posting the info! All the best.
Thank you for posting this schedule. I am looking forward to this visit and actually seeing him in person.
Hey Father!
Thanks for this schedule! I saw something about this on TV and wanted to refer to it in my blog!
-Mark Fresh
[...] think if you click here his schedule for the following week should open [...]
Thank you for posting the Pope’s itinerary. I knew about the Yankee Stadium mass but I wasn’t aware that Pope Benedict’s birthday was on Wednesday nor did I realize that he will be speaking at Catholic University.
Thank you Father for the dates and times. I visited the EWTN site and could find nothing that stated the times these ceremonies were to take place. I don’t want to miss any of the masses and am hoping that they might be in the “extraordinary” form.
Thank you father
I wish we all could get to see him.
God Bless.
If it has always been taught that the Catholic church contains all the theological truths and is necessary for salvation, why is it that the pope is visiting with ecumenical leaders, worshiping in mosques and embracing false religions?
I would have expected the Pope to visit a mosque while in Washington or New York. Wasn’t there time in his schedule?
WARNING: THIS COMMENT SLANDERS THE POPE!–Father Joe
Father Joe,
Being civil with false religions is one thing, but taking part in any of their services has always been against the Catholic faith. The Catholic church is no longer actively trying to convert non-Catholics to the faith and that is a big problem. The Church led by Pope Benedict has taken the approach that a person need not be part of the Catholic church to be saved, and this is heresy. Although the pope may not have kissed the koran this time, it is a known fact and I have pictures that show Pope Benedict wearing white moslem slippers and bowing toward Mecca in other visits. How many missionaries gave their blood rather than even bow their heads to a pagan statue?
This most recent visit by the Pope was very alarming for me as a Catholic for many reasons. The first is that Our Blessed Mother Mary was never mentioned by the pope in any of his dialogue. He never mentioned praying the rosary or wearing the scapular as was urged by Our Lady of Fatima. Secondly, statistics show that 70% of so called Catholics in this country do not believe that bread and wine are truely turned into the actual body and blood of Christ at mass (transubstantiation). By denying this or any one dogma of the Catholic church, a member is automatically excommunicated by their actions and is no longer a Catholic yet the pope ignored this huge problem and never addressed it. Not only this but, the pope allowed known pro-abortionists and non-Catholics to receive “communion” at his mass, violating another rule of the Catholic faith.
Father, please open your eyes and stop following this new ecuemenistic faith that is being called “Catholic”. It is not Catholic by a long shot. I urge you Father, to go back and read some of the stories of the lives of the saints such as Saint Dominic or Saint John Vianney and you will see again what true Catholicism is. The current pope and his hierarchy have been taken over by bad men that continue to propagate heresy after heresy and people are sucking it up because they have either forgotton or never knew what real Catholicism is. This is all part of the one world church that will eventually be the seat of the anti-christ. Remember God said in the bible “when I come back there will only be a handful left that still have the faith”. How can this be if the catholic church is 65 million strong in America? The reason is because the Catholic church today is a mere shell for looks only. Again, I urge you Father to please look hard at this and reconsider.
Sincerely in Christ,
John Sheahan
FATHER JOE: SEE MY RESPONSE BELOW
Yes, you are correct, Catholics are forbidden to actively participate in the worship rituals or celebrations of false religions. We have no argument about that. But I take exception to the notion that the Church is no longer actively seeking the conversion of such non-Catholics to the true faith. The Holy Father was cordial to the non-Christians at the John Paul II Cultural Center last week. He accepted their gifts and spoke about the need for dialogue and cooperation, especially to better our society and for peace. He accepted their gifts and thanked them for their hospitality. The Holy Father did not recommend religious indifferentism or deny the Church’s missionary mandate.
Indeed, he said the purpose of the Pope John Paul II Cultural Center was to offer a “Christian voice” to those of many faiths (or none) who sought the answer to the ultimate questions about meaning and purpose in the world.
First, given freedom of conscience and a plurality of faiths, he noted a history of
inter-faith prayer services, but such would not represent a uniform religious ritual forced upon others. Christians would be allowed to pray in their own distinctive way without pollution from the foreign faith content of non-Christian religions. Second, joint initiatives in charity activities that benefit the poor and hurting would present no doctrinal threat whatsoever. Third, a shared voice on important public issueswould give Catholics a better opportunity for important political gains. These three interfaith activities result in an enhanced mutual understandingand promote the common good. We can work together to further those ethical values discernable with human reason.
The Holy Father has no doubt observed that religious liberty allows the Catholic Church to flourish in the United States. He writes about religious freedom, saying that all members in society must work “to ensure that citizens are afforded the opportunity to worship peaceably and to pass on their religious heritage to their children.” Such freedom does not deny evangelization and efforts applied along with divine grace for the conversion of souls.
Pope Benedict XVI is NOT ashamed of Jesus Christ and the Gospel! He states clearly:
The Holy Father is not afraid of dialogue, because he trusts that the “voice of truth” will reveal God’s relationship to us and the world. It is hinted, but left prudently unsaid, that this truth will be none other than that which we already trust and have given a name in Christ. That which is false will fall away.
Where has Pope Benedict XVI ever said that anyone can be redeemed and saved apart from Jesus Christ? You assume too much. Just because we do not want to force conversions with burning coals and the rack is no evidence that Jesus is now “optional” to salvation. Part of the argument about the new petitions for Jews in the Tridentine Mass is because the Holy Father and the Church still insists that no one is saved apart from Christ. All are called to know and love him.
Your comment is hard for me to read given that your detraction against the Pope is so very savage and, I am sorry to say this, sinful for one who purports to be a good Catholic. Have you not read the many things the Pope has written? Have you listened at all to his words of reflection and correction? Maybe you are too angry to see the wonderful signs of hope that follow this successor to St. Peter. You are presumptuous in the way the Protestant reformers once were in their mockery of the Pope. The end result was that they were estranged from full communion in the true Church.
You make too much of white slippers and signs of human respect. He does not go out of his way to offend Muslims; it is enough that he suffers their rebuke when he speaks about peace and basic truths. Or have you forgotten the cries of millions of radicals, “Death to the Pope!” The only word I have for your nit-picking is “petty”. You are obligated as a Catholic to give obedience to the Church and the Holy See. You are to show respect to his shepherds. The teachings of the Holy Father, and certainly we are dealing here with matters of faith and morals, are to be given religious assent by believers. And please do not quote me dead popes. It is the Church and the Magisterium that has the privilege of interpreting them, not you or me. I am ashamed of traditionalist Catholics who read Church documents with the same methodology as anti-Catholic Protestant fundamentalists interpret the Bible. We follow a living Pope.
You say that you are alarmed by the Pope’s visit. Let us look at your purported reasons:
1. “Our Blessed Mother Mary was never mentioned by the ‘pope’ in any of his dialogue[s].”
It seems to me that the Pope spoke about Mary appropriately a number of times. He mentioned several years ago in the so called RATZINGER REPORT some six reasons why Marian devotion and faith were important. Have you forgotten? On his recent visit to Washington, DC, I heard him with my own ears speak about the Blessed Mother:
Here are a few random words from prior to his visit:
As for praying the rosary or wearing the scapular, the first is noble and witnessed by his example of prayer in the Shrine and in the Popemobile. As for the scapular, many of us wear the Brown Scapular of Mount Carmel and not the Green Scapular of Fatima. Many of us pray the rosary fruitfully without recourse to “private” revelation. You complain too much. You have something against this Pope and will do whatever you can to malign him. This is a sickness of the soul and might even be demonic in origin. Yes, even the devil can distort religiosity for his twisted purposes. You are placing your personal vendetta ahead of the Holy Father’s authority as chief Apostle and successor of St. Peter. He is the Vicar of Christ. Who are you by comparison? I suspect that Mary is not pleased. You can be disappointed in what was said or not said. But, you should not judge the one to whom you owe filial respect and obedience.
Prior to the Holy Father’s visit, my god-daughter at CUA and students from around the world prayed the rosary with the Pope. It was beautiful with reflections for each of the mysteries. That was also carried on television, but I suspect your bigotry has erased it from your memory. He prays the rosary with tens of thousands of pilgrims who stand vigil beneath his window at the Vatican. Did you listen to that by radio or real audio on the web? He speaks of the rosary as that “traditional Marian prayer which helps us to understand better the central moments of salvation realized by Christ”. He exhorts the sick to turn to Mary and to entrust “all your needs to her”. He tells married couples “to make the praying of the rosary in the family a moment of spiritual growth under the maternal gaze of the Virgin Mary”. I recall from a few years ago that Pope Benedict XVI had this to say about Fatima: “Although anxieties and sufferings have not been lacking, and there are still reasons for apprehension about the future of humanity, what the ‘Lady in white’ promised to the little shepherds is consoling: ‘In the end, my Immaculate Heart will triumph.’” I believe the same. This is the truth from the Pope. You seem to disagree with him. You have rejected the cry of Pope John Paul against fear and now you repudiate Pope Benedict and his hope in Christ. I stand with Peter and the Church. Where do you stand?
2. “Statistics show that 70% of so-called Catholics in this country do not believe that bread and wine are truly turned into the actual body and blood of Christ as ‘mass’ (Transubstantiation).”
The Holy Father was not the one who gave the pro-abortion politicians holy communion. He has urged, even back when he was a Cardinal, that such people are not suitably disposed for the sacrament. However, bishops have been passive to the question. Even a Pope is limited in his authority in regards to how another bishop operates his diocese. As for the REAL PRESENCE, he has written extensively about the Eucharist and his reverence in offering Mass has visibly demonstrated the truth about transubstantiation. Most Catholics clamoring to see him have embraced this great truth without qualm or reservation. The students at CUA had an evening of Eucharistic adoration the night before the Holy Father’s visit. They did this as a testimony to their Catholic faith. The Holy Father went immediately to the Eucharistic chapel in the Shrine and prayed there. The Holy Father had this to say to his bishops at Vespers at the Shrine:
Oops, not only did the Pope speak about the Eucharist and the participation of the men in holy orders with the high priesthood of Jesus Christ, he also mentioned the breviary and the rosary. I guess you must have slept through this part of the Pope’s visit. Otherwise, you would be guilty of outright lies. Last I heard, bearing false witness still broke the commandments!
Ecumenism does not utterly describe or exhaust my faith or modern-day Catholicism. How dare you beseech a priest to violate his conscience and to disobey the bishop and Church to which he has solemnly promised obedience under pain of mortal sin? You sir are very much mistaken about many things. If you reject Pope Benedict then you reject Peter. That means that YOU are guilty of the charge which YOU level against me. You may be Catholic by baptism, but any who would break away from this Catholic fold under Pope Benedict, traditionalist or not, has more in common with Martin Luther than with Pius V. Accidentals change, but the deposit of faith remains safe and secure. I pity you for not recognizing the difference. If you want to cast your lot with schismatic groups and excommunicated bishops, well, that is your business. But I will not damn myself for you or anyone else. I have read the lives of the saints and I also know my religion. Pope Benedict XVI has, himself said, that we might see a smaller but more faithful Church in the future. However, the remnant that will be faithfully awaiting Christ’s return is not in your band of renegades. I will pray that you will find enlightenment from the Holy Spirit, repent of your sins against Christ’s Church and shepherds, and return one day to the safe harbor of faith.
As things stand right now, you are no more worthy for Holy Communion than the pro-abortion politicians you abhor. They would murder innocent children. You would rob the children of the true Church and usher forth spiritual death.
I will fervently pray for you,
Father Joe